Sales & Marketing Study 2018: Trade Promotion Management
Working Off the Same Page
Running a concurrent shopper marketing campaign can improve support for a trade promotion program by 22%; adding a trade promotion component can improve the ROI of shopper marketing eff ort by 29% (see chart 2). The higher the level of integration between the two, the better the incremental results can be, according to extensive data analysis from Foresight ROI.
With data like that readily available, it would seem logical that shopper and trade programs would be planned, sold in and executed in lockstep by this point in time. After all, they’re typically conducted in the same venues and targeted at the same shoppers (or at least similar pools). Heck, they even often employ the same marketing tactics.
Then again, the CG industry hasn’t always operated logically. These are, after all, the people who used to sell hot dogs in packs of 10 and buns in packs of eight.
And so, in many organizations, shopper and trade aren’t in lockstep — they’re simply trying to avoid stepping on each other’s toes. Case in point: While walking attendees through a “best practice” example of the annual trade planning process at a recent industry event, the presenter identified the most likely stage at which the shopper plan might be considered.
“Wouldn’t it make sense to have someone looking across all of these things?” asks Craig DeSimone, director of global revenue management at Kellogg Co. “Companies need to understand better that this is all a commercial investment,” said DeSimone, adding that he believes Kellogg is farther ahead than most CGs in this regard.
This understanding is becoming even more critical. In fact, there has been recent discussion across the industry not only about aligning shopper and trade activity, but about building systems and processes that will let companies integrate planning and analysis across trade, shopper, national consumer promotion, digital marketing, e-commerce and even packaging to provide a holistic view of all commercial spending. The spider web-style path to purchase caused by the move to omnichannel shopping has made doing so far more of a business imperative than it ever was before.
Moving toward such a broad commercial view requires companies to take a fresh look at the key building blocks they use for planning, execution and performance management to develop better methods of upstream strategic collaboration.
It also might require them to use a “blank sheet” approach for budgeting that could be facilitated by another recent industry trend: zero-based budgeting. Roughly one-fifth of CGs have already forsaken the traditional year-over-year approach to budgeting and are starting from scratch, according to recent research from CGT and Cierant Corp.
While some ERP platforms are working on this growing need for alignment, there currently is no single tech stack that will let companies easily analyze all investments together, analysts say. If and when there are, revamping or even replacing existing systems to accommodate the big-picture view will require significant time and resources.
That’s why PwC Strategy& suggests initiating the change when the organization is already planning a major technology implementation (like the migration to S/4HANA being undertaken by many of SAP’s clients). Such upgrades are an ideal time for companies to determine what business process improvements can be undertaken to make the implementation even more effective.
To read the rest of the 2018 Consumer Goods Sales & Marketing Study, click on the links below:
- Editor's Note: Confronting the Consumer-Driven World
- The Progress Report: 'Improvement' Is for Losers
- Organization: Taking the '&' Out of Sales & Marketing
- New Product Development: A Made to Order Marketplace
- Data & Analytics: Going Deeper with the Data
- Trade Promotion Management: Working Off the Same Page
- Consumer Engagement: Something to Talk About
To download a PDF of the full report, click on the attachment below.